Legal Opinion

State v. . Camby

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 11, 1935PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.

It is provided by chapter 23, Public Laws 1933, as amended by chapter 469, that in all trials in the Superior Court, wherein the defendant stands charged with an offense other than capital, it shall be competent for the defendant, when represented by counsel, to enter a conditional plea of guilty, or nolo contendere, if the court shall permit the latter plea; and thereupon the court may hear and determine the matter without the intervention of a jury. The defendant is permitted to demur to the evidence as in cases under the Mason Act, C. S., 4643, preserve his exceptions thereto, if…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. State v. Lytle.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  2. State v. . HartsfieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  3. State v. HymanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
  4. State v. . HoltSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1884
  5. State v. . PulliamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. State v. . EmerySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
  2. State v. EmerySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
  3. State v. . LuedersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  4. State v. HudsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  5. State v. LewisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API