Legal Opinion

Commissioner of Environmental Protection v. Connecticut Building Wrecking Co.

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided August 10, 1993No. 14435; 14436; 14437PublishedCited by 74 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeters, C. J.

The principal issue in these consolidated appeals is the constitutional necessity of a jury trial in an environmental enforcement action. The trial court rendered judgment in these three environmental actions, which had been consolidated for trial, against the defendants, Connecticut Building Wreck*177ing Company, Inc. (CBW), and Geno Capozziello and Russell Capozziello,1 and in favor of the plaintiff, the commissioner of environmental protection (commissioner). The defendants appealed from the judgment of the trial court to the Appellate Court, and we transferred the appeals to this court…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Tull v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Nevada v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. DeLaurentis v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  4. Cheshire Mortgage Service, Inc. v. MontesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
  5. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. JonesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by74 opinions

  1. Fink v. GolenbockSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
  2. Mazziotti v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
  3. Delahunty v. Massachusetts Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
  4. Associated Investment Co. Ltd. Partnership v. Williams Associates IVSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  5. Ventres v. Goodspeed Airport, LLCSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005

69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API