Legal Opinion
In Re J. P. Linahan, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided November 8, 1943No. 142, 143PublishedCited by 164 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FRANK, Circuit Judge.
1. Appellants complain that the District Court, having appointed Referee 01-ney as Special Master in Chapter X proceedings begun by involuntary petition and contested by appellants, denied appellants’ application to remove that Special Master because of bias. Appellants point to matters alleged to show such bias, most of which are so frivolous as to deserve no discussion. Special emphasis is put on these facts: The Master has heretofore entered orders, accompanied by findings, adverse to appellants; the District Court’s orders, approving these orders of the Master, were,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United States v. American Trucking AssociationsSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Kentucky Railroad Tax CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Perkins v. Endicott Johnson CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
- Morehead v. New York Ex Rel. TipaldoSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by164 opinions
- Liteky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Aysar Abdulrahman v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
- Kramer v. BD. OF ADJUST., SEA GIRT.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
- In Re International Business MacHines Corporation, United States of America v. International Business MacHines CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
- United States v. Richard O. BertoliCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
159 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.