United States v. Husted
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
LUCERO, Circuit Judge.
Michael Ray Husted challenges his conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 2250, part of the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act (“SORNA” or “the Act”), for failure to register as a sex offender after traveling in interstate commerce. He makes four arguments on appeal: (1) SORNA does not apply to him because his interstate travel was complete before the Act became effective; (2) SORNA does not apply to him because Missouri state law did not require him to register; (3) if SORNA does apply to him, it violates the Ex Post Facto Clause of the Constitution; and (4) SOR-NA is…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. St. CyrSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Connecticut National Bank v. GermainSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Duncan v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- United States v. LanierSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Carr v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Fish v. KobachCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
- Thomas v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
- United States v. HinckleyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. DixonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.