Legal Opinion

United States v. Husted

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided November 5, 2008No. 16-9541PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LUCERO, Circuit Judge.

Michael Ray Husted challenges his conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 2250, part of the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act (“SORNA” or “the Act”), for failure to register as a sex offender after traveling in interstate commerce. He makes four arguments on appeal: (1) SORNA does not apply to him because his interstate travel was complete before the Act became effective; (2) SORNA does not apply to him because Missouri state law did not require him to register; (3) if SORNA does apply to him, it violates the Ex Post Facto Clause of the Constitution; and (4) SOR-NA is…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. St. CyrSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  2. Connecticut National Bank v. GermainSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Duncan v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  4. United States v. LanierSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Carr v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  2. Fish v. KobachCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
  3. Thomas v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
  4. United States v. HinckleyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
  5. United States v. DixonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API