Legal Opinion

United States v. Dixon

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided December 22, 2008No. 08-1438, 08-2008PublishedCited by 83 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POSNER, Circuit Judge.

We have consolidated for decision the appeals in two cases that raise overlapping issues, primarily under the ex post facto clause of Article I, section 9, of the Constitution.

Both defendants were convicted — Dixon after a bench trial on stipulated facts, Carr after conditionally pleading guilty — of violating the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act (part of the Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act of 2006), 18 U.S.C. § 2250. The Act, which went into effect on July 27, 2006, imposes criminal penalties on anyone who, being required by the Act to register,…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Calder v. BullSupreme Court of the United States · 1798
  3. Bouie v. City of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Dobbert v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by83 opinions

  1. Carr v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  2. United States v. GouldCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2009
  3. Reynolds v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  4. United States v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2011
  5. United States v. GuzmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010

78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API