Legal Opinion
Carr v. United States
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided June 1, 2010No. 08-1301PublishedCited by 256 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Sotomayor
Since 1994, federal law has required States, as a condition for the receipt of certain law enforcement funds, to maintain federally compliant systems for sex-offender registration and community notification. In an effort to make these state schemes more comprehensive, uniform, and effective, Congress in 2006 enacted the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act (SORNA or Act) as part of the Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act, Pub. L. 109-248, Tit. I, 120 Stat. 590. Among its provisions, the Act established a federal criminal offense covering, inter alia, any person who *442(1) “is…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Mertens v. Hewitt AssociatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Smith v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- United States v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Gwaltney of Smithfield, Ltd. v. Chesapeake Bay Foundation, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by256 opinions
- Sherley v. SebeliusCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2011
- State v. WilliamsOhio Supreme Court · 2011
- Gundy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
- Digital Realty Trust, Inc. v. SomersSupreme Court of the United States · 2018
- Reynolds v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
251 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.