Legal Opinion

United States v. Hinckley

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided December 9, 2008No. 07-7107PublishedCited by 133 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PAUL J. KELLY, Circuit Judge.

Defendanh-Appellant Shawn Lloyd Hinckley appeals from his conviction for failing to register pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act (“SORNA”), 18 U.S.C. § 2250, enacted July 27, 2006. On appeal, he argues that (1) the indictment was constitutionally defective because it sought to prosecute him for behavior that predated SORNA’s effective date; (2) the application of SORNA in his circumstances violates the Ex Post Facto Clause; (3) he was denied due process because he had no notice that he was *928required to register under SORNA; (4) Congress’s…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. United States v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. Weaver v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Food & Drug Administration v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. United Sav. Assn. of Tex. v. Timbers of Inwood Forest Associates, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Kansas v. HendricksSupreme Court of the United States · 1997

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by133 opinions

  1. State v. WilliamsOhio Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Carr v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  3. Thomas v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
  4. United States v. GouldCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2009
  5. Reynolds v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2012

128 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API