Legal Opinion
Frankenmuth Mutual Insurance v. Wal-Mart Associates' Health & Welfare Plan
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided January 30, 2002No. 2:01-cv-72347PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
HOOD, District Judge.
I. BACKGROUND/FACTS
The facts in this matter are not in dispute. This is a declaratory action filed by the parties seeking a determination of the parties’ rights and liabilities under the Plan documents and no-fault automobile insurance contract at issue.
On October 10, 2000, Victoria S. Noble was involved in an automobile accident and sustained certain injuries. At the time of the accident, Ms. Noble was an employee of the Wal-Mart stores and a participant in its health care benefits plan, the Wal-Mart Associates’ Health and Welfare Plan (the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Citizens Insurance Co. of America v. Pitney Bowes Software Systems Employee Medical & Health Care Service Corp.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2007
- Lehman v. Executive Cabinet Salary Continuance PlanDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2003
- Saunders v. TJX Cos.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2017