Lehman v. Executive Cabinet Salary Continuance Plan
District Court, S.D. Ohio
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND OPINION
MARBLEY, District Judge.
I. Introduction
This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff Hazel P.W. Lehman’s Brief in Support of Complaint for Enforcement of Rights and Clarification of Future Rights Under ERISA. For the following reasons, the Court ENTERS JUDGMENT ON THE MERITS in favor of Plaintiff, overturns Defendant Provident Life & Accident Insurance Company’s (“Provident”) denial of benefits, and remands the matter to Provident for further proceedings consistent with this Order.
II. Procedural History and Procedural Posture
Plaintiff brought this action pursuant to the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Bob G. Wilkins v. Baptist Healthcare System, Inc. Life Insurance Company of North AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
- Max W. Perry v. Simplicity Engineering, a Division of Lukens General Industries, Inc., a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- Benito T. PEREZ, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
- Nester v. Allegiance Healthcare Corp.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2001
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Giddens v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2004