Legal Opinion
Citizens Insurance Co. of America v. Pitney Bowes Software Systems Employee Medical & Health Care Service Corp.
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided March 2, 2007No. 03-75031PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER REGARDING CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
GERALD E. ROSEN, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
In this case, Plaintiff Citizens Insurance Company of America (“Citizens”) seeks a declaration that the coverage provided to non-party Gordon Shenkus under the Defendant health care plan, the Pitney Bowes Software Systems Employee Medical & Health Care Service Corp. (the “Pitney Bowes Plan”), is primary to the coverage provided to Mr. Shenkus under the terms of a no-fault automobile insurance policy issued by Citizens. Citizens also seeks reimbursement of over $228,000 in medical…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Robert D. Sprague, Plaintiffs-Appellees/cross-Appellants v. General Motors Corporation, Defendant-Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
- Martin Hansen, Cross-Appellee v. The Continental Insurance Company and Commercial Insurance Company of Newark, New Jersey, Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
- Virginia Armistead, Cross-Appellants v. Vernitron Corporation Aie--Division of Vernitron Group Insurance Plan, Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
- Hugh Edwards v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Schornhorst v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2009