Legal Opinion
United States v. McHan
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided September 29, 2003No. 01-2060, 02-2067 and 02-2090PublishedCited by 64 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Affirmed in part, reversed in part and remanded by published opinion. Judge NIEMEYER wrote the opinion, in which Judge WIDENER joined. Judge LUTTIG wrote an opinion concurring in part and concurring in the judgment in part.
OPINION
NIEMEYER, Circuit Judge.
Following the conviction of Charles McHan, Sr. for drug-trafficking and related offenses, the district court determined, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 853(a), that McHan was required to forfeit to the United States approximately $1.5 million in proceeds obtained as a result of his criminal conduct. When McHan could not account for the whereabouts of…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Harris v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Curtis v. LoetherSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Tull v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- City of Monterey v. Del Monte Dunes at Monterey, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by64 opinions
- Luis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- United States v. Andracos MarshallCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2017
- United States v. JarvisCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
- United States v. ParrettCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. Victor Robert Nava, Sr., AKA Big Vic, and Victoria NavaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.