Legal Opinion

United States v. Andracos Marshall

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided September 25, 2017No. 16-4494PublishedCited by 102 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Motion denied by published opinion. Judge Agee wrote the opinion, in which Judge Keenan and Judge Harris joined.

AGEE, Circuit Judge:

After Andracos Marshall was convicted of various crimes at trial, the Government initiated forfeiture of his substitute assets. In response to the Government’s motion, the district court entered an order of forfeiture. Marshall now petitions this Court to release the subject assets so that he may hire appellate counsel of his choice for the appeal of his criminal convictions. We deny his motion for the reasons stated below.

I

The Government filed a sealed criminal…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Jones v. BarnesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Griffin v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  3. Douglas v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Evitts v. LuceySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Wheat v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by102 opinions

  1. Clinton Folkes v. Warden NelsenCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2022
  2. Finch v. Covil Corp.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2019
  3. Affinity Living Grp., LLC v. Starstone Specialty Ins. Co.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2018
  4. ARMSTEAD v. COLOPLAST CORP.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2020
  5. Alexander v. MooreDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 2020

97 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API