Legal Opinion
United States v. Jarvis
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided August 28, 2007No. 06-2264PublishedCited by 78 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MURPHY, Circuit Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
This is an interlocutory appeal from a district court order denying the motion of Defendant-Appellant Dana Jarvis to release funds. At issue is the propriety of two notices of lis pendens filed under New Mexico state law by the United States on substitute property potentially subject to criminal forfeiture under 21 U.S.C. § 853.
This court has jurisdiction pursuant to the collateral order doctrine. United States v. Musson, 802 F.2d 384, 385 (10th Cir.1986). Applying an exception to the usual rule that issues not presented below are forfeited on appeal, this…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Singleton v. WulffSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Russello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. James Daniel Good Real PropertySupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Trierweiler v. Croxton & Trench Holding Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
- United States v. Vampire Nation A/K/A Fredrik Von Hamilton A/K/A Frederick Hamilton Banks, Frederick H. BanksCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by78 opinions
- Richison v. Ernest Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
- First Western Capital Management Co. v. MalamedCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
- York v. City of Las CrucesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- Crowe & Dunlevy, P.C. v. StidhamCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
- United States v. GordonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.