Legal Opinion

United States v. Victor Robert Nava, Sr., AKA Big Vic, and Victoria Nava

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 18, 2005No. 03-30010PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by Judge BYBEE; Dissent by Judge RYMER.

BYBEE, Circuit Judge:

Victor “Big Vic” Nava, Sr., was convicted of conspiracy to distribute and possession with intent to distribute methamphetamine. The jury also rendered a special verdict that several properties were used to facilitate Ms crimes or were proceeds of them and should be forfeited to the government pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 853. Victor’s daughter, Victoria Nava, petitioned the district court claiming that she held legal title to two of the properties. The district court denied Victoria’s petition to set aside the forfeiture.

We must…

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Austin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Swift v. TysonSupreme Court of the United States · 1842
  4. Alexander v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Libretti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. United States v. Liquidators of European Federal Credit BankCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  2. United States v. HallCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2006
  3. Gowan v. Patriot Group, LLC (In Re Dreier LLP)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2011
  4. United States v. TimleyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007
  5. Piedade Pedro De Almeida, Harber Corporation, Gatex Corporation, Mabon Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API