Legal Opinion

State v. Miller

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 3, 1950No. 722PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarnhill, J.

The defendants, on their appeal here, rely solely upon their exception to the ruling of the court below denying their motion in arrest of judgment. The motion was well advised and must he sustained.

It is a universal rule that no indictment, whether at common law or under a statute, can be good if it does not accurately and clearly allege all of the constituent elements of the offense sought to be charged. S. v. Morgan, 226 N.C. 414, 38 S.E. 2d 166.

“An indictment for an offense created by statute must be framed upon the statute, and this fact must distinctly appear upon the face of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. . MorganSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
  2. State v. . JacksonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  3. State v. . ColeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  4. State v. . LilesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1878
  5. State v. . BallangeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. State v. SparrowSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  2. State v. GreerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  3. State v. EasonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  4. State v. BeachSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  5. State v. PerrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API