State v. Miller
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtBarnhill, J.
The defendants, on their appeal here, rely solely upon their exception to the ruling of the court below denying their motion in arrest of judgment. The motion was well advised and must he sustained.
It is a universal rule that no indictment, whether at common law or under a statute, can be good if it does not accurately and clearly allege all of the constituent elements of the offense sought to be charged. S. v. Morgan, 226 N.C. 414, 38 S.E. 2d 166.
“An indictment for an offense created by statute must be framed upon the statute, and this fact must distinctly appear upon the face of the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. . MorganSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
- State v. . JacksonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- State v. . ColeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
- State v. . LilesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1878
- State v. . BallangeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
3Cited by25 opinions
- State v. SparrowSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
- State v. GreerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- State v. EasonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
- State v. BeachSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
- State v. PerrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.