Legal Opinion

State v. . Ballangee

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 5, 1926PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.

The indictment charges that the defendant “unlawfully and wilfully did operate a lottery, to wit, a slot machine (chapter 138, Public Laws 1923) against the form of the statute,” etc. The statute provides: “It shall be unlawful for any person, firm or corporation to operate, keep in his possession or in the possession of any other person, firm or corporation, for the purpose of being operated, any slot machine that shall not produce for or give to the person who places coin or money, or the representative of either, the same return in market value each and every time such machine is operated…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. . MosesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1830
  2. State v. . LilesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1878
  3. State v. . CarpenterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
  4. State v. . EdwardsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  5. State v. . EasonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1874

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. State v. McBaneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
  2. State v. . HowleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  3. State v. . ColeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  4. State v. GibbsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  5. State v. MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API