Legal Opinion

State v. Sparrow

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 13, 1970No. 15PublishedCited by 148 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MooRE, J.(3) Each defendant received a greater sentence in the Superior Court than had been imposed by the district court. Appellants contend that this increase in sentence denied them due process of law and violated rights secured to them by the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution. “Until recently, it was the general rule that a trial de novo meant a sentence de novo.” State v. Stafford, 274 N.C. 519, 531, 164 S.E. 2d 371, 379. Defendants insist that the rule stated in Stafford, and supported by voluminous authority, was overruled by the decision in North Carolina v. Pearce,…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. United States v. PetrilloSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. Cramp v. Board of Public Instruction of Orange Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
  4. In Re BurrusSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
  5. State v. GreerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by148 opinions

  1. Blackledge v. PerrySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Colten v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. State v. HarveySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  4. State v. CovingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  5. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982

143 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API