Legal Opinion

State v. Perry

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 31, 1977No. 159PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LAKE, Justice.

There was no error in the denial of the motion in arrest of judgment. Such motion is to be distinguished from a motion to vacate or set aside an erroneous judgment in order that a proper judgment may be entered. A motion in arrest of judgment is proper when it is apparent that no judgment against the defendant could be lawfully entered because of some fatal error appearing in (1) the organization of the court, (2) the charge made against the defendant (the information, warrant or indictment), (3) the arraignment and plea, (4) the verdict, and (5) the judgment. 21 Am. Jur. 2d,…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Woodson v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. State v. SparrowSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  3. State v. HendersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  4. State v. TaylorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  5. State v. RieraSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. State v. SturdivantSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  2. State v. HuntSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2003
  3. State v. JerrettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  4. State v. GraySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  5. State v. MoormanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API