Legal Opinion

State v. . Jackson

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 30, 1940PublishedCited by 62 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBabNhill, J.

Larceny at common law was confined to “goods and chattels”; it did not extend to land, because land could not be feloniously taken and carried away, except insignificant parcels thereof. S. v. Burrows, 33 N. C., 477; 36 C. J., 736, sec. 6. It, as a common law offense, is concerned with personal property only, and its nature has not been altered by the statutes making it larceny to steal things affixed to realty and severed therefrom by the thief. 36 C. J., 736, sec. 6. Therefore, it was not larceny, at common law, to steal anything adhering to the soil. S. v. Burrows, supra; 17 R. C. L., 33.

Th…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. State v. . GibsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
  2. S. v. . WilkersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
  3. State v. . HarbertSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
  4. State v. . LilesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1878
  5. State v. . CorpeningSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by62 opinions

  1. People v. DillonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  2. State v. SparrowSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  3. State v. CoxSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  4. State v. . GregorySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  5. State v. EvansSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API