Legal Opinion
Caron v. Inland Wetlands & Watercourses Commission
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided June 2, 1992No. 14328PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtShea, J.
The sole issue in this appeal is whether the plaintiffs’ application for a wetlands permit was automatically approved when the local inland wetlands agency failed to hold a public hearing on the application within sixty-five days after its receipt, in accordance with General Statutes (Rev. to 1989) § 22a-42a (c)1 and the Berlin inland wetlands and watercourses regulations § 5.6 (a).2
*271The plaintiffs, Ernest and Florine Caron, applied to the named defendant, the Berlin inland wetlands and watercourses commission, for a permit to place fill and to construct drainage systems and roadways for a…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Huck v. Inland Wetlands & Watercourses Agency of GreenwichSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Peck v. JacqueminSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- State v. ChicanoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- State v. MagnanoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters of America v. ShapiroSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- State v. MetzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Smith v. Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of GreenwichSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Gay & Lesbian Law Students Ass'n v. Board of TrusteesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Angelsea Productions, Inc. v. Commission on Human Rights & OpportunitiesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Sharp v. Wyatt, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1993
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.