Legal Opinion

Faris v. Burroughs Adding Machine Co.

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided November 1, 1929No. 5182PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GIVENS, J.-

— Respondent in company with a young man named Lamb was driving in a Ford car south on a north and south road which intersected an east and west road on which latter road appellant Tonkin was driving west in a Dodge automobile. Along the side of both highways were high grasses and weeds which obstructed the view and prevented both drivers from seeing the other prior to their entry into the intersection. Both approached the intersection at the same time resulting in a collision in the northwest quadrant of the intersection.

The Ford ear was turned over twice and came to rest upside…

2Cases cited69 opinions

  1. Simpson v. . Foundation Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1911
  2. Pierce v. United Gas and Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Cosselmon v. . DunfeeNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
  4. Citti v. BavaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Pilmer v. Boise Traction Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1908

64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Jorstad v. City of LewistonIdaho Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Woyak v. KonieskeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
  3. Kozlowski v. RushIdaho Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Owen v. Taylor Ex Rel. TaylorIdaho Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Stephanofsky v. HillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1950

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API