Legal Opinion
Golden Gate Bridge & Highway District v. Filmer
California Supreme Court
Decided April 12, 1933No. Docket No. S.F. 14830PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWaste, C. J.
The Golden Gate Bridge and Highway District initiated this proceeding in mandamus to compel the respondents, its president and secretary, to execute bonds of the District in the principal amount of $200,000, a portion of an issue of $35,000,000 authorized at an election held in the District November 4, 1930, for the purpose of raising funds for constructing a bridge across the Golden Gate. The validity of these bonds was upheld by this court in Golden Gate Bridge & Highway District v. Felt, 214 Cal. 308 [5 Pac. (2d) 585], and by the United States District Court for the Northern District of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Old Colony Railroad v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Golden Gate Bridge & Highway District v. FeltCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- Peery v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- O'Farrell v. County of SonomaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Westinghouse Electric & Manufacturing Co. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Wheeler v. Board of Trustees of Fargo Consolidated School DistrictSupreme Court of Georgia · 1946
- Connerly v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- County of San Bernardino v. WayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Dalton v. State Property and Buildings CommissionCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1957
- Stone v. City of HobbsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1950
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.