Legal Opinion
County of San Bernardino v. Way
California Supreme Court
Decided September 30, 1941No. L. A. 17869PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCurtis, J.
The petitioner, the county of San Bernardino, filed in this court its petition for a writ of mandamus to compel the respondent county surveyor to prepare a diagram of the property included within Boad Improvement District No. 38 of the County of San Bernardino, and to make an assessment, both as provided by the Befunding Assessment Bond Act of 1935. (Stats. 1935, p. 2023, as amended Stats. 1937, p. 1675; Stats. 1938, Ex. Sess., p. 73; Stats. 1939, p. 1637; Deering’s Gen. Laws, Act 881 j.)
Road Improvement District No. 38 was organized in 1927 under the provisions of the Boad Improvement…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Bank of Columbia v. OkelySupreme Court of the United States · 1819
- Von Hoffman v. City of QuincySupreme Court of the United States · 1867
- Walker v. WhiteheadSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
- Heron v. RileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
- Estate of StanfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Coast Bank v. HolmesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- In Re HerreraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Department of Mental Hygiene of Cal. v. KirchnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Gray v. WhitmoreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- Trabue Pittman Corp. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.