Legal Opinion
Christoffel v. Wisconsin Employment Relations Board
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided May 19, 1943PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFowler, J.
The respondents, Nicholas Imp and Michael Bohachef, employees of the Allis-Chalmers Manufacturing Company, hereinafter referred to as “the company,” were complainants in a proceeding before the Wisconsin Employment Relations Board, hereinafter referred to as “the board,” in which the appellants, Harold Christoffel and Allis-Chalmers Workers’ Union No. 248, United Automobile Workers of America, C. I. O., hereinafter referred to as “the union” or “Local 248,” were charged with unfair labor practices. Christoffel is an employee of the company, and a member and president of the union, and a…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Thornhill v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Phelps Dodge Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Milk Wagon Drivers Union, Local 753 v. Meadowmoor Dairies, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- National Labor Relations Board v. Link-Belt Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Allen-Bradley Local No. 1111 v. Wisconsin Employment Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Alabama State Federation of Labor v. McAdorySupreme Court of Alabama · 1944
- James v. Marinship Corp.California Supreme Court · 1944
- Vogt, Inc. v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Local 695Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1956
- Hathaway Bakeries, Inc. v. Labor Relations CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
- Wisconsin Employment Relations Board v. Algoma Plywood & Veneer Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1948
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.