Legal Opinion
Vogt, Inc. v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Local 695
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided February 7, 1956PublishedCited by 50 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGehl, J.
In a memorandum opinion filed by the trial judge he stated his conclusion that the picketing had not been conducted for an unlawful purpose, but that it constituted a violation of sec. 103.535, Stats., which provides as follows:
“Unlawful conduct in labor controversies. It shall be unlawful for anyone to picket, or induce others to picket, the establishment, employees, supply or delivery vehicles, or customers of anyone engaged in business, or to interfere with his business, or interfere with any person or persons desiring to transact or transacting business with him, when no labor dispute, as…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Chaplinsky v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Thomas v. CollinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Giboney v. Empire Storage & Ice Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Virginia Electric & Power Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- American Steel Foundries v. Tri-City Central Trades CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Local 695 v. Vogt, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Hanna Mining Co. v. District 2, Marine Engineers Beneficial Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Phelps v. Physicians InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 2009
- McCauley v. Tropic of CancerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
- Independent Dairy Workers Union of Hightstown v. Milk Drivers & Dairy Employees Local No. 680Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1956
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.