Legal Opinion

Alabama State Federation of Labor v. McAdory

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 25, 1944No. 6 Div. 234PublishedCited by 239 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARDNER, Chief Justice.

Plaintiffs, under the Declaratory Judgment Statute of this State (Title 7, §§ 156-168, Code of 1940), seek to test the constitutional validity of what is commonly referred to as the “Bradford Act,” which concerns labor and labor organizations and passed by the Legislature in 1943. Acts 1943, p. 252, Code 1940, Tit. 26, § 376 et seq. All parties upon this appeal argue the case upon the assumption of the regularity of the proceeding in every respect, and the case will be so considered here.

The attack is upon the Act as a whole and upon several of its separate sections.…

2Cases cited95 opinions

  1. Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Thornhill v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  3. National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
  4. Nebbia v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  5. Murdock v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1943

90 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by239 opinions

  1. Alabama State Federation of Labor v. McAdorySupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Young v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1969
  3. Moore v. Mobile Infirmary Ass'nSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  4. Reed v. BrunsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  5. Fireman's Fund Am. Ins. Co. v. ColemanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981

234 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API