Legal Opinion

Fallon v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 24, 1939No. Civ. 11106PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWard, J.

This is an application for the issuance of a writ of prohibition to the Superior Court of the State of California in and for the City and County of San Francisco and one of the judges thereof to restrain, during the pendency of appeal, the granting of a motion to vacate an order setting aside a judgment.

The litigation had its inception in a case entitled “Ben Liebman et al. v. M. L. Choynski” wherein plaintiffs for themselves and on behalf of others owning parcels in a tract of land sought to enjoin defendant from erecting or using any building within the alleged restricted tract for…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Holtum v. GriefCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  2. United Railroads v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Crescent Canal Co. v. MontgomeryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Eisenberg v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Garoutte v. HaleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Daar v. Yellow Cab Co.California Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Parker v. BowronCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Bowles v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  4. California Gasoline Retailers v. Regal Petroleum Corp. of Fresno, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1958
  5. In Re AlbertoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API