Legal Opinion

Eisenberg v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Decided May 17, 1924No. S. F. No. 11111PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

This is an application for a writ of review to annul an order of the respondent court vacating a restraining order theretofore granted by it for the pur pose of preserving the status quo pending an appeal The petitioners herein had commenced an action in the respondent court for an injunction, and upon the filing of their complaint made an application for an injunction pendente lite. An order to show cause was issued thereon and after a full hearing thereof the court denied petitioners’ application for an injunction pendente lite and discharged the order to show cause. Desiring to…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Holtum v. GriefCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Curtis v. SutterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
  3. Natoma Water & Mining Co. v. ClarkinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
  4. Hicks v. MichaelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
  5. United Railroads v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. DiGenova v. State Board of EducationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Cole v. RushCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  3. People v. GordonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  4. Nathanson v. MurphyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  5. Maxwell v. PerkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API