Legal Opinion

Mattila v. Mason

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided August 7, 1979No. TC 23823, CA 10582, SC 26127PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTongue, J.

Petitioner brought this mandamus proceeding in circuit court seeking an order requiring defendant, a district judge, to schedule a hearing as requested by petitioner on an alleged traffic infraction without requiring petitioner to first post bail in the sum of $27. On appeal from an order by the circuit court denying such relief, the Court of Appeals, citing its previous decision in Hoffman v. French, 36 Or App 739, 585 P2d 730 (1978), held that it was "unable to reach the merits” of the case for the reason that Oregon Laws 1975, ch 611, which made district courts courts of record and…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Sniadach v. Family Finance Corp. of Bay ViewSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Brown v. Multnomah County District CourtOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Walkinshaw v. O'BrienSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1943
  4. State Ex Rel. Maizels v. JubaOregon Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Bechtold v. WilsonOregon Supreme Court · 1947

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Easton v. HuritaOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  2. State v. SwansonOregon Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Hoffman v. FrenchOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  4. State ex rel. Bowman v. BlockMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981
  5. Easton v. HuritaOregon Supreme Court · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API