Legal Opinion

Bechtold v. Wilson

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 16, 1947PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLusk, J.

In the view we take of the case the only question that need be decided is whether the remedy of writ of review was available to the appellants: If it was not, it makes no difference whether the ruling on the demurrer was erroneous or otherwise.

In Asher v. Pitchford, 167 Or. 70, 76, 115 P. (2d) 337 (1941), we had occasion to say that the scope of the writ of review and the character of decisions of inferior tribunals that may be called in question by that proceeding “are matters not always easy of solution and which have not been clearly defined by the previous decisions of this court.” The…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Evans v. ChristianOregon Supreme Court · 1873
  2. Fanning v. GillilandOregon Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Garnsey v. County CourtOregon Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Oregon Coal Co. v. Coos Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Dayton v. Board of EqualizationOregon Supreme Court · 1897

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Duddles v. City Council of West LinnCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975
  2. Miller v. SCHRUNKOregon Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Lincoln Loan Co. v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  4. School District No. 68 v. HoskinsOregon Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Meury v. JarrellOregon Supreme Court · 1974

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API