Legal Opinion

Easton v. Hurita

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 24, 1981No. C-79-6-65, CA 16874, SC 27347Published

1Opinion of the Court

625 P.2d 1290 (1981)

290 Or. 689

Thomas EASTON, Petitioner,

v.

Robert E. HURITA, Respondent.

No. C-79-6-65; CA 16874; SC 27346.

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Decided March 24, 1981.

Argued and Submitted January 7, 1981.

Thomas Easton, Willamina, in pro per.

William Gary, Deputy Sol. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were James E. Brown, Atty. Gen., John R. McCulloch, Jr., Sol. Gen., and Patrick N. Rothwell, Certified Law Student, Salem.

Before DENECKE, C.J., and TONGUE, LENT, LINDE, PETERSON and TANZER, JJ.

TONGUE, Justice.

This is an action for damages for false imprisonment…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. United States v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Gustafson v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Brown v. Multnomah County District CourtOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  4. State v. FloranceOregon Supreme Court · 1974
  5. State v. HehmanWashington Supreme Court · 1978

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API