Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Maizels v. Juba

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 5, 1969PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolman, J.

This is an appeal from the issuance of a peremptory writ of mandamus by the circuit court.

Petitioner operates a theater in Portland. He scheduled a two-week showing of two films entitled “Love Robots” and “Little Girls.” On the first day of the showing a deputy district attorney attended a performance. The deputy thereafter filed an affidavit and made application to a district judge for a search warrant to search petitioner’s theater and to seize the films. The ground asserted as a basis for the warrant ivas the purported dissemination of obscene matter in violation of ORS 167.151. The…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Wilbur v. United States Ex Rel. KadrieSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  2. State Ex Rel. Ricco v. BiggsOregon Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Matter of Whitman. No. 1New York Court of Appeals · 1918
  4. State ex rel. Shaw v. WareOregon Supreme Court · 1886
  5. State Ex Rel. State Public Welfare Commission v. County Court of Malheur CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1949

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Espinoza v. Evergreen Helicopters, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Sterne, Agee & Leach, Inc. v. U.S. Bank National Ass'nSupreme Court of Alabama · 2014
  3. State Ex Rel. Automotive Emporium, Inc. v. MurchisonOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Parks v. BOARD OF CTY. COM'RS OF TILLAMOOK CTY.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1972
  5. State Ex Rel. Johnson v. RichardsonOregon Supreme Court · 1976

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API