Legal Opinion

Easton v. Hurita

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 24, 1981No. C-79-6-65, CA 16874, SC 27347PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*691TONGUE, J.

This is an action for damages for false imprisonment arising as a result of plaintiff’s arrest for a minor traffic offense. It presents the question whether a police officer who stops a person for a minor traffic offense can not only place that person under arrest, but also put him in jail, rather than give him a citation and then release him, when the maximum penalty for the infraction is a fine of $250.

More specifically, however, the question presented for decision is whether plaintiff’s complaint alleged sufficient facts to constitute a cause of action for false imprisonment.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Gustafson v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Brown v. Multnomah County District CourtOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  3. State v. HehmanWashington Supreme Court · 1978
  4. McBride v. MagnusonOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  5. State v. CarterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Pierce v. Multnomah CountyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
  2. Sager v. McClendenOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  3. State v. PorterOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  4. 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1006, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 1678 Stephanie G. Pierce v. Multnomah County, Oregon City of Portland, Oregon Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation District of Oregon Steve Duncan Janet Bowdle And, George KarcherCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
  5. State v. AlvaradoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API