Wick v. Gunn
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Action brought in Supreme Court to vacate a decision and award of the 'State Industrial Commission in favor of Charles D. Gunn as claimant and against S. J. Wick, as respondent, and the Fidelity & Deposit Insurance Company of Maryland, as insurance carrier.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
STEWART, C.
The respondent, 'S. J. Wick, and the insurance carrier, the Fidelity & Deposit Insurance Company •of Maryland, seek review of a decision of the State Industrial Commission awarding compensation to claimant, Charles D. Gunn, for injuries sustained during the course of' his employment by the respondent; it 'being urged that the award should not have been made because the facts show that, claimant failed to use a safety appliance provided, which would have prevented the injurv.
The statutes and the rules of this court make the decisions of the State Industrial Commission on…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Potter v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Adams v. Iten Biscuit Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- Spurr v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Catlett v. YoungIllinois Supreme Court · 1892
- State v. AlcornTexas Supreme Court · 1890
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Estes v. ConocoPhillips Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2008
- Stark v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1922
- Special Indemnity Fund v. StocktonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
- Willis v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Oklahoma-Arkansas Tel. Co. v. FriesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.