Legal Opinion
Willis v. State Industrial Commission
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided March 30, 1920No. 10816PublishedCited by 41 opinions
Higgins, Pitchford, and Bailey, JJ., dissenting. Action to review decision of State Industrial Commission refusing compensation for personal injuries to Lon Willis.
1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.
This action was commenced in this court on the 9th day of August, 1919, for the purpose of reviewing a decision of the State Industrial Commission rendered on the 14th day of July, 1919, wherein the petitioner was denied compensation under the Workmen’s Compensation Act (chapter 246, Session Laws 1915).
The findings of the commission were as follows:
“The facts in this case agreed upon are as follows: It is agreed between the claimant and respondent, Alko Nak Coal Mining Company and Coal Operator’s Exchange, that on the 18th day of February, 1919, the employes of the Alko Nak Coal Mining…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Bryant v. FissellSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1913
- Adams v. Iten Biscuit Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- Whiting-Mead Commercial Co. v. Indus. Accident Comm'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
- Thomas v. Proctor & Gamble Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1919
- Wick v. GunnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. CardilloCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940
- Stasmos v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- Stanolind Pipe Line Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Cassell v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1926
- Lucky-Kidd Mining Co. v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.