Legal Opinion

Catlett v. Young

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided November 2, 1892PublishedCited by 31 opinions

Appeal from the Appellate Court for the Third District;— heard in that court on appeal from the Circuit Court of Yer■milion county; the Hon. Edward P. Yail, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Baker

Laura Young, appelléé, prosecuted this action on the case, against Hiram B. Catlett and Herald Catlett, appellants, to recover damages for injuries sustained by her by reason of the death of her husband, caused by his falling down the shaft of a coal mine, the top and entrance to which, as she alleged, said appellants willfully failed to securely fence by gates properly covering and protecting said shaft and the entrance thereto. She recovered a verdict and judgment in the trial court for $2000 damages, and the judgment was affirmed in the Appellate Court.

The statutory provisions upon which…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Litchfield Coal Co. v. TaylorIllinois Supreme Court · 1876
  2. Bartlett Coal & Mining Co. v. RoachIllinois Supreme Court · 1873

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Schultz v. Henry Ericsson Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Monteith v. Kokomo Wood Enameling Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Kellyville Coal Co. v. StrineIllinois Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Wick v. GunnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  5. Hall v. West & Slade Mill Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1905

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API