Legal Opinion
Oklahoma-Arkansas Tel. Co. v. Fries
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided January 3, 1928No. 18105PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LEACH, C.
This action was commenced in this court by the petitioners, Oklahoma-Arkansas Telephone Company and Aetna Life Insurance Company, to review an award made to Mamie Fries by the State Industrial Commission. The Industrial Commission found “that the claimant herein was in the employment of the respondent and was engaged in a hazardous occupation covered by and subject to the provisions of the Workmen’s Compensation Law, and that while in the course of such employment and arising out of the same, the claimant sustained an accidental injury on the 8th day of September, 1925; that as a…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Western Indemnity Co. v. PillsburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Matter of Heitz v. . RuppertNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
- Western Metal Supply Co. v. PillsburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Stasmos v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- St. Louis Mining & Smelting Co. v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Breimhorst v. BeckmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
- Stanolind Pipe Line Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Indian Territory Illuminating Oil Co. v. LewisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
- Sunshine Food Stores v. MooreheadSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
- Town of Granite v. KidwellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.