Legal Opinion
Estes v. ConocoPhillips Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided March 4, 2008No. 104,031PublishedCited by 68 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKauger, J.
¶ 1 The United States District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma certified two first impression questions of Oklahoma law:
1. Under the 2005 version of the Oklahoma Standards for Workplace Drug and Alcohol Testing Act, are evidential breath tests to determine an employee's blood alcohol content, laboratory services which must be confirmed by a licensed testing facility?
2. What is the standard to determine whether an employer has committed a willful violation of the Testing Act as the term in used in 40 O0.$.2001 § 563(A)7
¶ 2 The plaintiff, Dennis E. Estes (Estes), a mechanical…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- National Ass'n of Home Builders v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- TRW/Reda Pump v. BrewingtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
- Ledbetter v. Oklahoma Alcoholic Beverage Laws Enforcement CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
- Holien v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1984
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by68 opinions
- Schovanec v. Archdiocese of Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2008
- Welch v. CrowSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2009
- MCINTOSH v. WATKINSSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2019
- STATE ex rel. PRUITT v. NATIVE WHOLESALE SUPPLYSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2014
- Bertrand v. Laura Dester CenterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2013
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.