Legal Opinion
State v. Newman
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided December 5, 1940PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJennings, J.
In his appeal from a conviction of theft and of receiving and concealing stolen goods, knowing them to have been stolen, the defendant claims, in effect, that the facts found do not support this conclusion.
No evidence was printed. The finding discloses the following undisputed facts: The defendant is an attorney at law. He has practiced for fifteen years in Hartford and prior to this occurrence enjoyed a good reputation for truth and veracity. On August 11, 1939, Harold Doyer stole a new Underwood typewriter in transit from the factory to Washington, D. C. It was packed in the original carton…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- State v. StoddardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940
- State v. FrostSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
- State v. ScottSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1907
- State v. MillerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940
- State v. WeinerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1911
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- State v. ScielzoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- State v. GabrielSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Commonwealth v. BorisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
- State v. McDonoughSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1942
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.