Legal Opinion
State v. Gabriel
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided March 13, 1984No. 11360PublishedCited by 91 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtArthur H. Healey, J.
The defendant went to trial on a three-count information with each count charging him with the crime of larceny by receiving stolen property. After a trial to the jury, he was found not guilty on the first two counts1 and guilty on the third count. That count charged him with larceny in the first degree by receiving stolen property in that at the town of Fairfield on March 16, 1981, he “did retain the legal property of one Julian Bell, valued in excess of Two Thousand Dollars . . . knowing that said property *407was probably stolen, in violation of Section 53a-119 (8) and Section 53a-122 (a) (2)…
2Cases cited62 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Mullaney v. WilburSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by91 opinions
- State v. RossSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Champagne v. Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- State v. DenbySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- State v. SiminoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
86 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.