Legal Opinion

State v. Frost

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided December 16, 1926PublishedCited by 80 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWheeler, C. J.

In his first three assignments of error the accused assigns as error the conclusion reached by the court in paragraph sixty-five of the finding, that “Friedman, Isaacson, Baker and Cohen set fire to and burned said factory building of A. Phillips & Company, Inc., with the knowledge of the defendant Frost and at his request and instigation and pursuant to their employment by Frost to burn said building,” because not supported by the facts found. His fourth assignment is that this conclusion was not proven beyond a reasonable doubt. His fifth and sixth assignments are that the evidence did not…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. ChapmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
  2. State v. LevySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
  3. State v. CareySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1904
  4. State v. WeinerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1911
  5. State v. WasheleskySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1908

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by80 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. DomanskiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1954
  2. State v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
  3. State v. CaseWashington Supreme Court · 1956
  4. State v. PundySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1959
  5. State v. WatsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973

75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API