Legal Opinion
State v. Miller
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided February 23, 1940PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJennings, J.
The sole question on this appeal is the constitutionality of certain provisions of § 554e of the 1939 Supplement to the General Statutes, appearing in the footnote. This was first raised by a de murrer to the information which was overruled, not on the ground that the statute was constitutional but on the ground that a decision of such importance should be left to a higher court. State v. Muolo, 119 Conn. 323, 326, 176 Atl. 401. No objection is made to the statute in so far as it requires the price of gasoline to be displayed on the pumps. The sole objection is to that portion which forbids…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- New State Ice Co. v. LiebmannSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Noble State Bank v. HaskellSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Williams v. Standard Oil Co. of La.Supreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Town of Windsor v. WhitneySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1920
- State v. MuoloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Gambone v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
- Seals v. HickeySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Sperry & Hutchinson Co. v. Director of the Division on the Necessaries of LifeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
- Builders Service Corp. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Merit Oil Co. v. Director of the Division on the Necessaries of LifeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.