Legal Opinion
State v. Stoddard
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided May 1, 1940PublishedCited by 116 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHinman, J.
Chapter 107a of the 1935 Cumulative Supplement to the General Statutes provided (§ 797c) for the appointment of a milk administrator with extensive powers, detailed in § 800c, to regulate the milk industry of the state and, in § 801c as amended by § 493d of the 1937 Supplement, that “Said administrator shall have power to establish, from time to time, a minimum price for the different milk areas of the state for each class and grade of milk or milk products sold to dealers and shall have power to define the number and type of classes of milk for the purposes of this chapter. To stabilize…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Nebbia v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- A. L. A. Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Panama Refining Co. v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- J. W. Hampton, Jr., & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- United States v. Rock Royal Co-Operative, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by116 opinions
- State v. MoynahanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
- Kellems v. BrownSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- Spector Motor Service, Inc. v. WalshCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
- Adams v. RubinowSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1968
- Jennings v. Connecticut Light & Power Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
111 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.