Legal Opinion
In Re Kennedy
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided March 27, 1992No. 91-783PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Per curiam
In this disciplinary case, the Board on Professional Responsibility (the Board) found that respondent, Thomas F. Kennedy, violated Disciplinary Rule 3-101(B) (prohibiting the practice of law in a jurisdiction where to do so violates regulations of the profession in that jurisdiction). The Board recommended a sanction of suspension for nine months with the requirement that respondent furnish proof of fitness as a condition of reinstatement. Respondent argues that violation of the disciplinary rule was not established by clear and convincing evidence and that the Hearing Committee improperly…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- In Re HutchinsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
- Matter of ShillaireDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
- In re of K.A.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
- In Re KennedyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
- Kennedy v. Bar Ass'n of Montgomery County, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1989
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- In Re QuaidSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
- In Re SteeleDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
- Attorney Grievance Com'n of Maryland v. Harris-SmithCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
- In Re SoininenDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2004
- In Re StarnesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.