Legal Opinion
In Re Starnes
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided July 31, 2003No. 02-BG-855PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Per curiam
In agreement with its Hearing Committee, the Board on Professional Responsibility concluded (1) that respondent DeAnge-lo Starnes violated Rule 8.1(a) of the Rules of Professional Conduct by falsely stating in connection with his application for admission to the District of Columbia Bar that the legal work he had been doing was supervised by an attorney licensed to practice in the District of Columbia; and (2) that after being admitted to the District of Columbia Bar, Starnes violated multiple other disciplinary Rules 1 by seriously neglecting his obligations to his clients, failing to…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- In Re RoundtreeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
- In Re LylesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
- In Re LewisDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
- In Re FowlerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- In Re ElginDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
- In Re UkwuDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
- Cass v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
- In Re Olekanma A. Ekekwe-KauffmanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2019
- In Re PondsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.