Legal Opinion

In re of K.A.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided November 20, 1984No. Nos. 83-799, 83-800PublishedCited by 55 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEBEKER, Associate Judge:

The parents of K.A. challenge the termination of their parental rights. Before us now, they argue that the trial court erred in concluding that there was sufficient record evidence to support the termination order. They also urge that the Code’s parental rights termination provision, D.C. Code § 16-2353(b)(l)-(4) (1981), violates constitutional due process protections. We affirm.

I

K.A., a female, was born in June 1975. Five years later, K.A.’s natural mother abandoned the family, leaving K.A.’s care and custody to her natural father. Soon thereafter, the father left…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Addington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Bolling v. SharpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  4. Smith v. Organization of Foster Families for Equality & ReformSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Woodby v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1966

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by55 opinions

  1. Appeal of H.R.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. In re D.R.M.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. District of Columbia v. WalkerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
  4. In re L.W.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. In re A.B.E.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API