Pathfinder Oil & Gas, Inc. and Cathlind Energy, Llc v. Great Western Drilling, Ltd.
Texas Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Guzman
Pathfinder Oil & Gas, Inc. claims a 25% working interest in certain Permian Basin mineral leases under a letter agreement Great Western Drilling Ltd. contends is unenforceable. On the eve of trial, the parties stipulated that "only" certain issues would be submitted to the jury and that favorable jury findings would "entitle[ ]" Pathfinder to specific performance in lieu of money damages. Tracking the stipulations, the jury charge included only the specifically enumerated jury issues, which the jury answered in Pathfinder's favor. The trial court rendered judgment awarding *885 specific…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- City of Houston v. Clear Creek Basin AuthorityTexas Supreme Court · 1979
- Coker v. CokerTexas Supreme Court · 1983
- National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh v. CBI Industries, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1995
- Heritage Resources, Inc. v. NationsBankTexas Supreme Court · 1997
- Forbau Ex Rel. Miller v. Aetna Life Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1994
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by233 opinions
- MDK Sociedad v. ProplantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2022
- Sanchez Oil v. Crescent DrillingCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2021
- American Precision v. Mineral WellsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2024
- Randel v. Travelers Lloyds of TX InsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2021
- Transverse v. IA Wireless SrvCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2021
228 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.