Sereboff v. Mid Atlantic Medical Services, Inc.
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Roberts
In this case we consider again the circumstances in which a fiduciary under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) may sue a beneficiary for reimbursement of medical expenses paid by the ERISA plan, when the beneficiary has recovered for its injuries from a third party.
I
Marlene Sereboff’s employer sponsors a health insurance plan administered by respondent Mid Atlantic Medical Services, Inc., and covered by ERISA, 88 Stat. 829, as amended, 29 U. S. C. § 1001 et seq. (2000 ed. and Supp. III). Marlene Sereboff and her husband Joel are beneficiaries under the plan. The plan…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Mertens v. Hewitt AssociatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Great-West Life & Annuity Insurance v. KnudsonSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Trist v. ChildSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Walker v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- National Collegiate Athletic Assn. v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by353 opinions
- CIGNA Corp. v. AmaraSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- U.S. Airways, Inc. v. McCutchenSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Montanile v. Board of Trustees of Nat. Elevator Industry Health Benefit PlanSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- ACS RECOVERY SERVICES, INC. v. GriffinCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012
- Fortis Benefits v. CantuTexas Supreme Court · 2007
348 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.