Legal Opinion

Sereboff v. Mid Atlantic Medical Services, Inc.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 15, 2006No. 05-260PublishedCited by 353 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Roberts

In this case we consider again the circumstances in which a fiduciary under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) may sue a beneficiary for reimbursement of medical expenses paid by the ERISA plan, when the beneficiary has recovered for its injuries from a third party.

I

Marlene Sereboff’s employer sponsors a health insurance plan administered by respondent Mid Atlantic Medical Services, Inc., and covered by ERISA, 88 Stat. 829, as amended, 29 U. S. C. § 1001 et seq. (2000 ed. and Supp. III). Marlene Sereboff and her husband Joel are beneficiaries under the plan. The plan…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Mertens v. Hewitt AssociatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Great-West Life & Annuity Insurance v. KnudsonSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  3. Trist v. ChildSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  4. Walker v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  5. National Collegiate Athletic Assn. v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1999

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by353 opinions

  1. CIGNA Corp. v. AmaraSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  2. U.S. Airways, Inc. v. McCutchenSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  3. Montanile v. Board of Trustees of Nat. Elevator Industry Health Benefit PlanSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  4. ACS RECOVERY SERVICES, INC. v. GriffinCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012
  5. Fortis Benefits v. CantuTexas Supreme Court · 2007

348 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API