Legal Opinion

In Re BP Products North America, Inc.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided January 25, 2008No. 07-0119PublishedCited by 129 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gaultney

delivered the opinion of the Court. 1

This mandamus proceeding concerns the enforcement of a discovery agreement governing what is commonly referred to as an “apex” deposition. The discovery agreement was signed by the attorneys for the parties, and filed as provided by Rule 191.1 and Rule 11. We conclude the trial court abused its discretion in failing to enforce the agreement.

The Teial CouRT Pkoceedings

Fifteen people died and hundreds suffered injuries in an explosion at relator BP Products North America, Inc.’s Texas City oil refinery. The hundreds of resulting lawsuits against BP Products…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. In Re Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaTexas Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Coker v. CokerTexas Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Formosa Plastics Corp. USA v. Presidio Engineers and Contractors, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Butnaru v. Ford Motor Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Lopez v. Muñoz, Hockema & Reed, L.L.P.Texas Supreme Court · 2000

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by129 opinions

  1. In Re Slavonic Mutual Fire Insurance Ass'n, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2010
  2. In Re Jacobs, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2009
  3. in Re Allstate County Mutual Insurance Company, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2014
  4. In Re Park Memorial Condominium Ass'n, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2010
  5. In re Liberty County Mutual Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2017

124 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API