Legal Opinion

Padilla v. LaFrance

Texas Supreme Court

Decided October 5, 1995No. 94-0579PublishedCited by 406 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPhillips, Chief Justice

joined by GONZALEZ, HIGHTOWER, HECHT, CORNYN, SPECTOR, and OWEN, Justices.

The primary issue presented is whether a series of letters between the parties’ representatives constituted a written settlement agreement enforceable under Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 11, even though plaintiffs withdrew their consent to the settlement before the letters were filed with the court and before judgment was rendered on the agreement. The court of appeals held that any agreement was unenforceable under Rule 11 because plaintiffs revoked consent before the letters were filed with the court. 875 S.W.2d 730.…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Fredonia State Bank v. General American Life Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Kennedy v. HydeTexas Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Donwerth v. Preston II Chrysler-Dodge, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Burnaman v. HeatonTexas Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Cohen v. McCutchinTexas Supreme Court · 1978

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by406 opinions

  1. Mobil Oil Corp. v. EllenderTexas Supreme Court · 1998
  2. EZ Pawn Corp. v. ManciasTexas Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Ford Motor Co. v. CastilloTexas Supreme Court · 2009
  4. In Re Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse of McAllen, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Fortis Benefits v. CantuTexas Supreme Court · 2007

401 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API